• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Donate
  • Become a Member
  • Volunteer With Us!
  • Cart

Waterford Foundation

  • Education
    • K-12 Education Programs
    • The Waterford Fair
    • Waterford Craft School
    • Waterford HIstory
    • Remote Learning
    • The Quakers
    • African Americans in Waterford
  • Preservation
    • Historic Buildings
    • Mill Stabilization Project (2009-2023)
    • John Wesley Community Church Restoration
    • Dashboard Map of Western Loudoun Development, 1950-2020
    • Phillips Farm
    • Notes from the Preservation Desk
  • Shop
    • Books
    • Donate
    • Membership
    • Lantern Light Fund
  • Events
  • Weddings & Rentals
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Meet the Staff
    • Meet the Board
    • Visit Waterford
    • Support
    • Join Us
  • News
  • Privacy Policy

Waterford History

How the Civil War Divided Waterford

June 23, 2026 by Abigail Zurfluh

Written by Debbie Robison; Edited by Larisa Epatko

—

Although Quakers were the original settlers of Waterford, Virginia, and maintained a significant presence, by the start of the Civil War in 1861, the town was home to a diverse population of tradesmen, farmers and laborers. While the Society of Friends held firm to pacifism and opposition to slavery, many of their neighbors were deeply integrated into Virginia’s traditional social order and viewed secession as a necessary defense of their state.

In May 1861, the divide within Waterford became official during a statewide referendum needed to ratify Virginia’s Ordinance of Secession, marking the state’s decision to separate from the United States. The Waterford precinct saw a sharp split in the referendum with local Quakers voting against it. Although Unionist sentiment was strong, a vocal and active minority of residents supported the Southern cause, creating an environment of local tension that persisted throughout the war.

The emergence of the Loudoun Rangers
Samuel C. Means (WF Archives)

This internal division was most vividly illustrated by the military units that drew from the local population. The town became a primary recruiting ground for the Loudoun Rangers, which was the only organized Union unit from the state of Virginia. Led by local miller Samuel C. Means, the Rangers calvary unit was composed of men who felt their primary loyalty belonged to the federal government.

At the same time, other men from the Waterford area, who were often the neighbors or former associates of the Rangers, joined Confederate units like the 35th Battalion of Virginia Cavalry,
famously known as “White’s Comanches.” Led by Elijah V. White, who lived just a few miles away, these soldiers were equally determined to defend their vision of Virginia.

Battle at the Baptist Church

The skirmish at the Waterford Baptist Church on August 27, 1862, was a direct result of these clashing loyalties. There, a group of Loudoun Rangers suffered a surprise attack at its encampment by White’s Comanches.

The Rangers used the church’s brick walls for cover, firing from the windows while the Confederates charged through the streets. The engagement ended in a Confederate victory. The physical and psychic toll on the town was immense. The sight of soldiers bleeding in the shadows of the church and the mill served as a visceral reminder of the deep fracture within the county.

The tactical importance of Walker’s Hill

To the southwest of the town center lies Walker’s Hill, a high point of land that became a critical tactical position for both armies during the war. Because of its elevation, the hill provided a commanding view of the town and the surrounding roads, making it a natural location for pickets and scouts.

In August 1863, almost exactly a year after the fight at the Baptist Church, the hill became the site of another fierce encounter. A detachment of the Loudoun Rangers, operating under Captain Daniel M. Keyes, was positioned on the hill when they were attacked by their Confederate counterparts, White’s Comanches.

The fighting was desperate and underscored the “no-quarter” nature of this localized war. During the melee, the Confederates suffered significant local losses, including the deaths of Captain Richard B. Grubb and his cousin John C. Grubb, both of whom were well-known members of the surrounding community.

Life in a contested town

Because of its location and its divided heart, Waterford spent much of the war under “contested” status, where control shifted frequently. A Union patrol might be welcomed in the morning, only to have a Confederate detachment arrive by evening to arrest “disloyal” citizens or seize supplies.

For the residents, this meant a life of constant vigilance. Families with Confederate sympathies had to hide their support when Union troops occupied the town, and Unionists lived in fear of being sent to Castle Thunder, the notorious Confederate prison in Richmond, when Southern forces held the area.

The war’s end and the long recovery

The end of the war in 1865 brought a cessation of combat, but the internal divisions of Waterford took time to heal. The community had to find a way to function again with former Rangers and former Confederates living side by side.

Today, Waterford is preserved as a National Historic Landmark. Its architecture remains as a silent witness to a time when the village was a microcosm of a nation at war with itself, a place where competing definitions of loyalty lived door to door.


Debbie Robison writes about Northern Virginia history. You can read more of her articles on her website.

Want to learn more about Waterford history and the Civil War? Check out further articles below!

Filed Under: history, Waterford History Tagged With: history

How Area Quakers Approached the Revolutionary War

June 23, 2026 by Abigail Zurfluh

Written by Debbie Robison; Edited by Larisa Epatko

—

The Revolutionary War period was a time of immense pressure for the Northern Virginia area’s Quakers, who found their properties seized and their loyalties questioned by both their government and their church. It was only in the final year of the war, 1783, that Joseph Janney purchased the 12-acre parcel that would eventually serve as the site for the formal founding of the village of Waterford.

The agricultural shift and the slave economy

In the years leading up to the Revolutionary War, the region surrounding what would become Waterford underwent a major economic transformation. Farmers transitioned from tobacco to wheat cultivation, making the area a key supplier for the transatlantic flour trade.

Quakers played a significant role in this shift; for example, Mahlon Janney constructed a prominent stone and wood grist mill around 1762 as a commercial investment.

While Quakers typically did not own enslaved people, their involvement in the flour trade indirectly supported the institution of slavery. The flour produced in Loudoun County was frequently exported to the British West Indies to sustain the labor force on sugar plantations.

This economic connection caused a moral conflict within the Society of Friends, as leaders like John Woolman and John Wesley questioned the ethics of profiting from goods that supported the miseries of enslaved people.

Neutrality and the peace testimony

As tensions between the colonies and Great Britain escalated, the Quakers’ commitment to their “peace testimony” placed them in a precarious position. The newly formed Commonwealth of Virginia required male residents to affirm their allegiance and participate in the military.

Because Quakers refused to swear oaths or bear arms, they were often viewed with suspicion or labeled as “disaffected” by American leaders. General George Washington himself expressed frustration in his correspondence, noting that Quakers were doing everything in their power to counteract militia laws.

Military fines and property seizure

When voluntary enlistment proved insufficient, Virginia implemented a draft. Quakers who refused to serve or pay for a substitute faced heavy financial penalties. In April 1781, numerous Quakers, including Mahlon Janney, were fined 100 pounds each for failing to perform military service.

Because Quakers refused to pay these wartime taxes and fines voluntarily, the local sheriff was authorized to seize their property for sale. This process, known as “distraint,” resulted in the continuous loss of personal possessions.

Records from the Philadelphia Meeting of Suffering show that Loudoun Quakers had a wide range of goods confiscated, including cash, horses, cattle, clothing, household pewter, bedding and even a Bible.

Impressment of provisions

Loudoun County became a vital source of supplies for the Continental Army, particularly during the Yorktown campaign of 1781. Military officials “impressed” (forcibly requisitioned) resources from the local population.

While many items were taken, the most heavily impressed resource from Loudoun County was live beef. Local drovers would drive herds of cattle south for several days to reach military camps, such as the quartermaster’s camp at Fredericksburg.

Despite their pacifism, Quakers like Isaac Walker, Joseph Janney and Mahlon Janney saw their provisions seized to support the war effort.

Loyalty oaths and faith expulsion

The conflict also created internal religious crises. The Society of Friends strictly forbade any action that could be interpreted as support for the war, including the affirmation of allegiance required by Virginia law.

When individual Quakers chose to affirm their loyalty to the Commonwealth — placing patriotism over their faith’s principles — they were often admonished by their local Monthly Meetings. If they refused to renounce their affirmation, they faced expulsion from the Quaker community.

High-profile local figures, such as Israel Thompson and John Hough Jr., were among those who eventually wrote letters condemning their own affirmations of allegiance to maintain their standing within the Society.


Debbie Robison writes about Northern Virginia history. You can read more of her articles on her website.

Want to learn more about Waterford history? Check out some more articles below!

Check out some more about Waterford history!

Quakers Arrive, an Agricultural Community Thrives
history,Waterford History

Quakers Arrive, an Agricultural Community Thrives

ByAbigail Zurfluh history,Waterford History June 23, 2026
Written by Debbie Robison; Edited by Larisa Epatko — The region between the Catoctin and Blue…
Read More
The Founding of Waterford
history,Waterford History

The Founding of Waterford

ByAbigail Zurfluh history,Waterford History June 23, 2026
Written by Debbie Robison; Edited by Larisa Epatko — The village of Waterford was founded in…
Read More
A General History of Waterford, VA: Waterford’s Past Reflects the History of the Nation
Black History,history,Home-page,News,quaker,Waterford History

A General History of Waterford, VA: Waterford’s Past Reflects the History of the Nation

ByElizabeth McFadden Black History,history,Home-page,News,quaker,Waterford History April 7, 2023
Written by Debbie Robison; Edited by Larisa Epatko — The story of Waterford can be told…
Read More

Filed Under: history, Waterford History Tagged With: history

Quakers Arrive, an Agricultural Community Thrives

June 23, 2026 by Abigail Zurfluh

Written by Debbie Robison; Edited by Larisa Epatko

—

The region between the Catoctin and Blue Ridge Mountains began to see European American settlement during the Great Awakening, a series of religious revivals in the 1730s and 1740s. While land generally was granted to wealthy speculators, it also attracted members of the Society of Friends, or Quakers, who sought a community where they could worship freely. Although Indigenous people had already moved out of the immediate area by this time, settlers found traces of their presence, including burial mounds, forts and established trail blazes on trees that marked crossings of the Potomac River.

The role of John Mead and Amos Janney

The specific land where Waterford now sits was originally part of a 703-acre tract identified by Patrick Lynch as a desirable land holding. Lynch assigned the land to John Mead, a Quaker carpenter from Maryland, and his father-in-law, Richard Abrill. Although title fees briefly transferred the land to Catesby Cocke in 1731, Mead purchased it back in 1733. As a skilled carpenter, Mead used a variety of specialized tools to carve a homestead out of the wilderness, possibly on this tract, farming small plots of wheat, rye and barley.

In roughly 1733, Amos Janney, a Quaker from Pennsylvania, relocated to a 253-acre portion of Mead’s tract. Janney’s arrival is verified by Quaker Monthly Meeting records from 1733 and 1734. Janney became a pivotal figure in the region’s development, serving as a surveyor for Lord Fairfax’s land agent. This position allowed him to identify other vacant land, and he eventually acquired more than 5,000 acres, which he sold or leased to other Quaker families, effectively establishing a cohesive religious community.

Founding of the Quaker Society

Religion was a cornerstone of early settlement life. While the Anglican Church of England was the official state-supported church, the colonial government was largely tolerant of Quakers because they provided necessary labor and were a buffer to the frontier.

In 1744, local Quakers received permission to establish the Fairfax Preparatory Meeting. Before a formal meetinghouse was constructed, Amos Janney hosted these religious gatherings in his own home. By 1749, Quaker households accounted for approximately 11% of the taxable men in the local Cameron Parish.

Land division and village origins

John Mead continued to divide his original 703-acre grant. In 1742, he sold 147 acres to David Griffith, and in 1743, he sold the remaining 303 acres to Francis Hague. Hague and Amos Janney were brothers-in-law, having married sisters back in Pennsylvania. It was on this specific tract purchased by Francis Hague that the village of Waterford would eventually be founded.

Although the year 1733 is often cited in relation to Waterford, it marks the arrival of the first settlers in the immediate area rather than the founding of the town itself. The village of Waterford was not formally established until 1784, more than five decades after the initial Quaker arrival.

Colonial economy and agriculture

The early Quaker settlers were risk-takers who arrived with few possessions, often relying on wagons and small carts to transport their families and belongings from Pennsylvania. Early farming focused heavily on tobacco, which was a labor-intensive crop that required small, hand-worked fields. To manage this labor, some Quaker farmers utilized indentured servants.

Over time, the economy shifted due to British mercantilist policies and the demand for exports. By the 1750s, the focus began to move from tobacco to wheat cultivation. This transition led to the proliferation of grist mills in the area, marking a new economic era that would eventually support the growth of the post-Revolutionary War village.


Debbie Robison writes about Northern Virginia history. You can read more of her articles on her website.

Filed Under: history, Waterford History Tagged With: history

The Founding of Waterford

June 23, 2026 by Abigail Zurfluh

Written by Debbie Robison; Edited by Larisa Epatko

—

The village of Waterford was founded in 1784 by Joseph Janney, a Quaker businessman who had already established himself with a retail store and tannery in nearby Leesburg, Virginia. Following the Revolutionary War, Janney looked to capitalize on the economic opportunities of the new nation. In 1781, he purchased a 12-acre parcel in Loudoun County, strategically located at a hub of existing roads and adjacent to Mahlon Janney’s operational grist mill and sawmill.

Janney’s plan was to create a commercial and industrial hub to serve the surrounding farming community. The location was ideal because the existing road network provided convenient access for customers, and the nearby sawmill offered the necessary materials for new residents to build their homes and workshops.

Panoramic Image of Bond Street from the Bond Street Tanyard. This area is across from the Waterford Mill and part of the oldest area of Waterford where Joseph Janney founded the Village.
The Moore Family and the naming of Waterford

The development of Waterford began in earnest in 1784 when Janney sold the first village lot, which included a stone house and stable, to Thomas Moore Jr. The Moore family became the cornerstone of the early community. Thomas Moore Jr. opened a general store to meet the pent-up demand for British goods, including coffee, rum, fine fabrics and tea.

Thomas was soon joined by his brothers, James and Asa. James Moore leased a tannery established by Janney to process raw hides into leather, while Asa Moore established a saddlery. Their sister, Ann, and her husband, Evan Taylor, a carpenter, also settled in the village, contributing their skills to its physical growth. This strong family presence eventually led to the village being named “Waterford” in honor of their ancestral home in Waterford, Ireland.

Industrial diversity and the apprenticeship system

Waterford quickly evolved into a self-sufficient cluster of related trades. To staff these
businesses, the Moores and other lot holders utilized an apprenticeship system managed by the county court. This system provided vocational training to “pauper apprentices,” who were young individuals from impoverished backgrounds, to learn essential skills such as tanning, blacksmithing and cabinet making.

As the village grew, other craftsmen established critical services:

  • Joseph Pierpoint: A blacksmith who purchased a lot in 1785 to repair tools and maintain the iron machinery required by the local grist mills.
  • William Paxson: A wheelwright and industrial screen-maker who, by 1789, produced specialized equipment like “rolling screens”, which were used for cleaning grain before it was milled into flour.
  • William Hough: Opened a second mercantile establishment around 1787 in a “red stone store house”, providing healthy competition and expanding the village’s role as a retail center.
Financial and religious challenges

The early years of the village coincided with significant political shifts in Virginia. To address Revolutionary War debts, the state implemented land taxes based on rental values. This created a moral dilemma for the pacifist Quaker community, who debated whether paying taxes for military debt aligned with their faith.

At the same time, the community was active in the movement for religious liberty. Waterford residents such as Asa Moore and Joseph Janney signed petitions against mandatory taxes for religious teachers.

The subsequent passage of the Statute for Religious Freedom in 1786 and the Marriage Act of 1785 provided the legal stability necessary for the Quaker community to flourish, ensuring their religious practices and marriages were fully recognized by the state.

A foundation for future expansion

By the end of the 1780s, the village had successfully established a diverse industrial and commercial base. The combination of essential trades, including blacksmithing, tanning and milling, alongside a growing retail sector, positioned Waterford as an increasingly important regional hub.

With a steady influx of skilled craftsmen and the successful integration of former apprentices into the local economy, the village sat on a solid foundation for continued physical and economic expansion into the coming decades.


Debbie Robison writes about Northern Virginia history. You can read more of her articles on her website.

Want to learn more about early Waterford? Check out some more articles below!

Check out these articles below!

How Area Quakers Approached the Revolutionary War

How Area Quakers Approached the Revolutionary War

ByAbigail Zurfluh history,Waterford History June 23, 2026
Written by Debbie Robison; Edited by Larisa Epatko — The Revolutionary War period was a time…
Read More
Quakers Arrive, an Agricultural Community Thrives

Quakers Arrive, an Agricultural Community Thrives

ByAbigail Zurfluh history,Waterford History June 23, 2026
Written by Debbie Robison; Edited by Larisa Epatko — The region between the Catoctin and Blue…
Read More
A General History of Waterford, VA: Waterford’s Past Reflects the History of the Nation

A General History of Waterford, VA: Waterford’s Past Reflects the History of the Nation

ByElizabeth McFadden Black History,history,Home-page,News,quaker,Waterford History April 7, 2023
Written by Debbie Robison; Edited by Larisa Epatko — The story of Waterford can be told…
Read More

Filed Under: history, Waterford History

A Letter Home from Springdale School

July 31, 2025 by Stephanie Thompson

Fairfax Meeting Schoolhouse

In 1856, Mary Frances “Mollie” Dutton [1840-1933]  was a girl of 16, writing a letter home to her parents from Springdale School in nearby Goose Creek (now Lincoln), about 10 miles southwest of Waterford. Mollie likely would have begun her studies in one of several small schools in Waterford, such as the small brick schoolhouse adjacent to the Friends’ meeting house on Loyalty Road. Quakers highly valued education, and Mollie’s parents sent her to boarding school at Springdale once she had completed her studies in the local schools. In Mollie’s letter below, excerpted from “To Talk is Treason”, we get a glimpse into the life of a young Quaker woman in the mid-nineteenth century.

Springdale 4th day noon

Dear Mother and Father

It has been some time since I last wrote home and feel as though I could say a great deal to you now about matters & things.

I expect you would like to know how I spend my time visiting and if I got anything good to eat. I went home with Maggie and never had a more pleasant time away from home. Mag lives with her Aunt Phebe Gregg a very feeble old lady. There was no one there but her, and an old housekeeper who was as kind as she could be and gave me everything good she could find.

7th day after dinner we went to Joseph Nichols and staid until after supper and then rode home. The next morning we did not go to meeting but spent the morning reading, talking & eating bell-flower apples. For dinner we had roast chicken and mince pie beside all the appurtenances which everybody has at common & uncommon times.

At 3 we started for old Springdale and it was near suppertime when we reached there. Social meeting did not begin until after supper and I hurried over my lessons for morning & would not have missed them for anything if it could have been helped, for Cousin Henry would have attributed it to us visiting.

I have got along very well so far this week and do hope I shall continue to do so the remainder of it. I received Sister Lidy’s letter on First Day and was very glad to get it. I will answer as soon as I can. I always write when I think I can well spare my time from my books. 

What do you think of my character, I am glad to tell you that my hundreds were not lost as I thought, but we were not examined in that study where 100 is omitted. I was so glad to hear it, for I did not think I had ever missed but one and think that was doing fairly well for 9 months. It was more than any of the rest done but Thammy Janney, hers was perfect.

Supper is over, our supper of bread, butter and molasses, and now comes study hour in a few minutes. Do you ever think of me working over my sums–little Sis Anna does, I expect. Never mind, when I come home I will learn her and Lidy how to work problems, and do hard sums.

I think Cousin Lizzie is very much pleased with my drawing. I am getting on better than any of the scholars. Perhaps when I come home I may know sufficient about it to set up a drawing class, then Sister Lizzie would teach school and we could have fine times, Anna should come to me certain, and the way we would cut up would be a caution to good fellows.

Mother, have we had much company lately or does thee trot about so much they cannot come? Now Lewis is gone, Sis is at home more, I expect, and gives thee an opportunity to leave home. I think she might write to me–it has been some time since I heard from her ladyship, tell her. She left her shoes here, and I have been trying to get an opportunity to send them to her but have not yet succeeded. She will have to come for them herself and spend 2 or 3 days. I should be very glad to have her, but she should not spend all 7th day morning in the sitting room chatting with a certain Springdale student, making someone else so uneasy. I have laughed so much over that.

Father, Cousin Henry told me to ask thee if thee needs any of his sympathy now. He also sends his warmest regards to thee and Mother and all enquiring friends. I have not had an answer from Han[nah?] yet; she promised me to write immediately. When do Uncle William and Aunt Louisa [Steer] start south. Give my love to them please and to all my friends if they enquire after me. Some of the girls want me to petition to Cousin Henry for spelling school tonight. The last one we had, Maggy and I chose up sides and had so much fun choosing the boys.

Oh I have so much to tell you but can not say more now. I hope you are all enjoying good health and getting along first rate. Give my love to Brother, Sisters and retain a large portion for yourselves. I remain your affectionate daughter.

Mary F. Dutton


Notes:

Springdale School was established in 1839 by a Goose Creek Quaker, Samuel M. Janney, as a Friends boarding school for girls. Local boys attended as day students.

To avoid using the pagan-derived common names for months and days of the week, Quakers adopted their own nomenclature for dates. Thus January is “First Month” and Sunday, “First Day.”


Find this and other stories from Mollie’s life in To Talk is Treason: Quakers of Waterford, Virginia on Life, Love, Death & Water in the Southern Confederacy, available online here.

Filed Under: history, News, quaker, Waterford History

End of Term Report: May 1884

June 5, 2025 by Stephanie Thompson

The one room school on Second Street served Waterford’s Black students from 1867 when it was built until 1957 when students were bussed into Leesburg. Sometimes serving over 60 students at once, many of whom were over 16 years old, the small space was filled with students eager to learn. Teachers and students alike worked hard to make the most of their new educational opportunities after Emancipation, as witnessed by a May 1884 visitor who shared his experience in the Loudoun Telephone:

Mr. Winton Walker and his students at the school on Second Street, c. 1920

‘On Friday evening last the Waterford colored school closed, at the end of an eight months’ session with Prof. Edw. F. Arnold as principal, Miss Mollie Saunders, assistant, and Messrs. Roberson [Robinson], Boyd, and Minor, Directors. 

‘The exercises clearly showed progress in the school, which was due to the untiring efforts of the teachers and directors together, with some assistance from interested patrons. Recitations, dialogues, music &c., were the order of the evening. A public examination of the pupils convinced the visitors of stores of knowledge fastened in their minds during the session.–The reading by some of the pupils would put to blush some of the scholars in our white schools. It was done with confidence and boldness. The singing, with all respect to the white folks, was so superior as to compare with the squeaking of a wheelbarrow and the notes of the woodthrush. Special praise in this direction is due to Miss Saunders, whose throat seemed to contain a harp of a thousand c[h]ords.

 ‘Flowers were displayed in great profusion and very tastefully arranged. The children were genteel in appearance and dignified in deportment….”

– Loudoun Telephone, 16 May 1884; as quoted in A Rock in a Weary Land, A Shelter in a Time of Storm, Souders and Souders, 2003.


Learn more about Waterford’s African-American heritage in A Rock in a Weary Land, A Shelter in a Time of Storm, available online here.

Filed Under: Black History, history, News, Waterford History

Waterford Foundation Beginnings, 1943-1970

May 2, 2025 by Stephanie Thompson

By John Souders, originally printed in the 2018 Waterford Fair Booklet

The Waterford Foundation: The Early Years—1943-1970

Each year thousands visit Waterford and marvel at a wonderfully intact remnant of early America. This year the village celebrates the Waterford Foundation, the far-sighted organization that for 75 years has worked to preserve and share that treasure. Its successes have been neither easy nor inevitable.

Black and white image of a stone house
Laura Page’s house stood on the southwest side of Main Street adjacent to 40155 (Goodwin-Sappington House).

By the 1930s, in the midst of the Great Depression, the old town was a near shambles, the hollowed out remnant of a long slow decline after the Civil War. Many locals doubted that the dilapidated buildings could or even should be saved from inevitable collapse. One charming old structure on Main Street, the final home of a former slave, was taken down for its stone, which was hauled to Leesburg.

The Pink House (40174 Main Street), originally an early 19th-century tavern, escaped a similar fate only because its brick proved too soft for reuse. As one dismayed newcomer put it, “Most every building looked as though it was about to fall apart … It seemed a truly deserted village.”

The one sign of life was the work of brothers Edward and Leroy Chamberlin, who had begun to repair and resell a number of deteriorating residences in and around town. The Chamberlins were an old Waterford Quaker family that fortunately had the means to tackle the job in the depression-ravaged community. But Edward died in 1940, and their momentum threatened to stall.

Allen B. McDaniel, architect and engineer and first president of the Waterford Foundation

Soon, though, a handful of concerned locals and a few recent arrivals came together and resolved to build on the Chamberlins’ progress. In 1943 they were incorporated by Virginia as the Waterford Foundation, Inc.  As a first step the founders organized themselves into a board of directors (there were no other members) and selected officers, including the first president, Allen B. McDaniel (1879-1965), an accomplished engineer with a firm in Washington. McDaniel had discovered Waterford, bought the old Quaker meetinghouse, and—with a thorough renovation—made it his home.

But where to begin? The new organization had no money and no real plan other than a desire “to preserve the historic buildings” and “to increase the public’s knowledge of life and work in an early American rural community.” As a tentative first step, the Foundation pulled together $825 to buy a dilapidated house that, fittingly, had been built circa 1800 for Mahlon Janney son of the town’s founder. They made necessary repairs and resold it in 1945 for $1,500. The organization would repeat this pattern of rescue and resale many times in the decades that followed, a bootstrap technique that was largely self-funding.

But not all needy buildings could or should be resold. A prime example was the defunct old mill, the iconic structure in the village. The Foundation was able to purchase that building in 1944 only because the Fadeley family stepped in with a $2,000 donation. Then, casting about for more sustainable ways to continue its work, the Foundation hit on the idea of holding an exhibition of arts and crafts and charging a nominal fee to attend. The success of the first such demonstration in 1944 exceeded the board’s hopes, and the “Waterford Fair” rapidly grew to a major cultural event in Loudoun and beyond, furthering the organization’s educational mission and providing a vital source of funding. [The Foundation will explore the history of the Fair in greater detail next year, the 75th anniversary of its modest beginning.]

Mahlon Janney House (15545 Butchers Row—also called the Doctor Edward’s House and Market Hill) was the Foundation’s first purchase.  Its long-neglected condition was typical of many Waterford buildings at the time.

Over the years the Foundation has confronted many challenges, some of its own making. An early and persistent one was a charge of elitism, coupled with secrecy. To help allay concerns, the board opened membership to anyone interested. But as president McDaniel put it in 1944, there was no certainty the people would “cooperate through a form of membership involving a nominal yearly contribution without some definite benefits or returns to them personally.” On that score he needn’t have worried, but suspicions about the Foundation’s motives long persisted in some quarters.

A greater threat to the long-term success of the Waterford Foundation arose from an unexpected source: the accelerating growth of Loudoun County. The population of the county had remained remarkably stable between 1800 and 1950, and few foresaw what would come next. Only belatedly did the board recognize that preservation of the mill village could not succeed without saving the green space that was its historical and visual context. The threat came to the fore in 1970 when the Water Street Meadow and Schooley Mill Barn properties came on the market, opening the possibility of new construction immediately adjacent to the town. Still, not all board members thought the threat was as great as the purchase price, and there were multiple resignations when the majority opted to buy the Water Street acreage. In hindsight the wisdom of their acquisition looks much clearer.

By 1970 the work of the Waterford Foundation had acquired a national reputation as a model of grassroots preservation. It had achieved its successes in restoring buildings, protecting open spaces and celebrating early American crafts and activities with virtually no public funding. That same year, in recognition of those accomplishments, the U.S. Department of the Interior designated Waterford and its surround as a national historic landmark district, a category reserved for the likes of Mount Vernon and Independence Hall.

But the work was not finished. The Waterford Foundation has continued to protect viewsheds, maintain fragile buildings, host the annual Homes Tour and Crafts Exhibit, and develop educational programs and exhibits. The challenges since 1970 and those ahead are topics for next year’s fair booklet.

Founding Members
Edgar H. BeansEdgar (1882-1957), was a livestock dealer and descendant of early Waterford Quakers.
Vera M. Chamberlin & son Edward M., Jr.Vera, from New Jersey, married into an old Waterford family. Her son was at one time treasurer of the Foundation.
Ellen H. & son Fenton M. Fadeley, Jr.The Fadeleys were an early Loudoun family. They lived at Rosemont, on the Old Wheatland Road.
Allen B. & Margaret B. McDanielAllen (1879-1965), a New England-born engineer, helped build the acclaimed Bahá´í temple near Chicago and was active in the Bahá´í faith.
Douglas N. & Winifrede (Frieda) E. MyersDoug (1896-1982), from an early Waterford family, was president of the Foundation in the 1960s. Frieda, a teacher, was from Indiana.
Paul V. & Pauline (Polly) S. RogersThe Rogers bought a farm near Waterford in 1937. Paul was a Washington attorney, Polly was from Kansas.
Frederic S. & Mary Phillips StablerThe Stablers were both of early Quaker families. They owned the Phillips Farm, where Mary was raised.

Filed Under: history, News, Waterford History

The Visit

September 6, 2024 by Stephanie Thompson

Mary Frances Dutton Steer [1840-1933] was the daughter of John B. Dutton and Emma Schooley Dutton and sister to Lizzie and Lida Dutton of Civil War-era Waterford News fame. She was a gifted poet and artist, and today’s historians are blessed to be able to study Waterford’s past through her eyes. Her poem “The Visit” was inspired by a visit of two elderly friends, Rachel Steer and Sarah White, when Steer herself was sixty-four, circa 1904. 

Ann T. Gover (1820-1896), Sarah G. Janney White (1815-1905), Hannah Mendenhall Worley (c1820- ), Rachel Lousia (Lucy) Steer Schooley (1825-1896), Rachel Steer (1814-1912). Rachel is in the lower right. The other women are not individually identified. Image courtesy of Taylor Chamberlin.

“The Visit” by Mary F. Steer

As printed in the booklet of the 1948 Waterford Foundation Exhibit of the Work of the Artists and Craftsmen of Loudoun County, Virginia.

They came to spend the afternoon
These dear old friends of mine;
One of them was eighty-eight,
The other, eighty-nine.’

With knitting-bag hung on an arm,
Their dress so clean and neat,
With aprons white as driven snow,
I tell you, they were sweet!

They tip-toed through the kitchen door, 
(“Front steps were hard to climb”)
For one of them was eighty-eight,
The other, eighty-nine.

Just half-past one it was they came,
“Oh! What a treat!” I said,
“To have an old-time visit!
It almost turns my head.”

I set for them the easy chairs,
They laid their wraps aside
And soon took out their knitting-work
How fast the time did glide!

They laughed and joked and told great yarns
Of happenings in the town
When they were young and went to school
To gentle Mary Brown.

At four I made the kitchen fire,
The supper to prepare.
(They could not stay till after dark
For dampness in the air.)

I brought my choicest dishes out
And gathered a bouquet
To decorate the table,
For it was a gala day!

Do you not think I ought to
Have seated them in state,
When one of them was eighty-nine,
The other, eighty-eight?

And long before the sun went down,
I saw them safely home.
They said they had a happy time,
And I was glad they’d come.

Strong is the chain that binds us
In friendship’s mystic tie,--
For I feel old as they do. 
And they feel young as I.

Filed Under: News, Waterford History

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 5
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

Email: oldschool@waterfordfoundation.org
Phone: 540-882-3018

Privacy Policy

Join Our Email List and Stay Connected!

Copyright © 2026 · Waterford Foundation · Log in